Save Money - no matter how much it costs!
In Category: The Legal Market
Save money - no matter how much it costs!
Linkedin is a useful mapping tool and is certainly better than a “little black book” because it automatically updates itself: this is almost as far as its utility goes; it is absolutely not a replacement for conventional recruitment methodologies. I acknowledge my bias but there are a number of “real world” limitations to Linkedin which seriously inhibit its ability to replace professional headhunters; these include: -
- Less than 60% of professionals are on Linkedin at all meaning that you are missing more than 40% of your target market.
- Linkedin themselves report that more than half of their members access their account for 0 -2 hours a week; they do not mention the proportion that never access their account. You can only contact the people who use their profiles.
- The proportion of the professional candidate market that will respond to an “inmail” about a new job is very low indeed and the proportion which responds positively lower still.
- Of the tiny number of self-selecting potential candidates that do respond positively the proportion that ultimately prove to be technically suitable for the role will be miniscule and it will pure random chance if that residual number meet the cultural needs of the business. Most Linkedin advert and inmail campaigns lead to nothing.
We know that some of our clients have tried very hard to make Linkedin work for them and failed: the usual reasons are that the response rate per job has been dreadful, the candidates that do apply are hopeless and the costs of accessing and administering the process far exceed any savings.
We publish about 50 online adverts a month including on Linkedin: across all paid for platforms we get an average ratio of applicants per job of 8:1; Linkedin updates gives us 0.2:1: out of 600 adverts and approximately 4,800 applications per year we count ourselves lucky if advertising produces five or six placements a year: well-structured and informed headhunt approaches are immeasurably more effective.
All firms will be able to point to hires which were made through the use of Linkedin but I don’t believe that the investment costs of paying fees to Linkedin, hiring large internal recruitment teams, paying for and attending Linkedin courses and even paying for staff to become “Linkedin Certified Recruiters” will ever be set off by a saving in professional recruitment fees.
Written by Mark HusbandBack to blog
Survey Results - The Leaky Pipeline
These are the results of our survey of over 12,000 lawyers asked to address questions relevant to the effect of gender on progression in the legal profession. The full article has been published in the October edition of Legal Business Magazine. Cogence Search are a highly specialist London and international Legal Recruitment Agency. Read the full article
THE LEAKY PIPELINE - Gender and Progression in the Legal Profession
Our article addressing the issue of gender and progression in the legal profession based upon an extensive survey involving over 12,000 lawyers. The full survey results can be found in the blog below. Read the full article
Earth Has Not Anything to Show More Fair: London and the Litigation Market
Four London-based dispute resolutions tell us why London is the leading jurisdiction for litigation. ‘The future of London dispute resolution lies in the ability of firms to sell our uniquely global dispute resolution skills to the world.’ Mathew Rea, Bryan Cave Read the full article